RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ? - I say let us go for C !

["Joel M. Halpern" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually, as far as I can tell the accountability is about the same in both 
cases, and in neither case as "direct" as one would philosophically like 
(but probably as direct as one can get in practice.)  Similarly, the 
"change control" appears to be equally in the IETF hands.

Yours,
Joel

At 10:31 PM 9/23/2004 +0200, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> - if done properly, this allows for a very straight forward
>   governance mechanism that is *directly* accountable to
>   the IETF and where change control is clearly vested in that
>   same community.  Again, the corporate solution is the
>   lightweight and straightforward solution.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf