Hi Donald, > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:33 AM Valery Smyslov via Datatracker > <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > > Review result: Has Nits > > > > ... > > > > Just out of curiosity - the draft adds a requirement that cookie > > SHOULD NOT be greater than 400 days. I wonder why this particular > > margin was chosen. Why not > > 365 days (a year) - it looks like a natural equivalent to "very long, > > but not infinite"? > > I like 400. If you want something to need refreshing in about a year to avoid expiry, > you need to allow some slack due to holidays, weekends, vacations, scheduling, > etc. You could maybe squeeze this down to 390 or 385 but 400 is a nice round > number. Understood. Thank you for the explanation. Regards, Valery. > Thanks, > Donald > =============================== > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx > > -- > last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call- > leave@xxxxxxxx -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
