Hi, On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 8:33 AM Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > Review result: Has Nits > > ... > > Just out of curiosity - the draft adds a requirement that cookie SHOULD NOT be > greater than 400 days. I wonder why this particular margin was chosen. Why not > 365 days (a year) - it looks like a natural equivalent to "very long, but not > infinite"? I like 400. If you want something to need refreshing in about a year to avoid expiry, you need to allow some slack due to holidays, weekends, vacations, scheduling, etc. You could maybe squeeze this down to 390 or 385 but 400 is a nice round number. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
