Hi Scott, Thanks for the review, your point is taken and i will plan to clarify jCards definition in 7095 versus the usage of jCard specification by the stir RCD framework and reference that properly. Thanks again. -Chris > On Feb 10, 2025, at 6:50 PM, Scott Hollenbeck via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Scott Hollenbeck > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned ART area reviewer for this draft. I found only one small > issue that might require clarification. In Section 4: > > "jCard is a comprehensive and extensible mechanism defined in the STIR RCD > framework." This sentence is confusing because jCard is defined in RFC 7095. It > feels like there's a word or two missing here. Also, this is the first time > that "STIR RCD framework appears in the draft. A reference to > [I-D.ietf-stir-passport-rcd] is probably appropriate, or perhaps a reference to > [I-D.ietf-sipcore-callinfo-rcd] might be more appropriate since that's where > the "jcard" Call-Info Token is defined. > > -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
