[Last-Call] Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Per,

 

Thank you for confirming and reviewing again. Version -20 has been submitted to address two new issues introduced -19 version, including the "te-packet types" prefix and the missing mandatory 'datastore' node in the "establish-subscription" RPC.

Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-20

 

Please also see my response inline.

 

Thanks,

Bo

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Per Andersson <per.ietf@xxxxxxxx>

Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2025 10:36 PM

To: Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cc: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; teas@xxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-18

 

Hi Bo!

 

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:35PM Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 

> Hi Per,

> 

> 

> 

> Thank you for the valuable review. The -19 version has been submitted to address all the comments:

> 

> Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-19

 

This import has changed prefix from what is in the originat module ietf-te-packet-types from RFC 8776 from "te-packet-types" to "te-pkt".

 

import ietf-te-packet-types {

-    prefix te-pkt;

+    prefix te-packet-types;

 

I suggest to revert this change and use the modules prefix. The benefit in a familiar module prefix is much larger than the cost of the extra characters.

 

[Bo Wu] Thanks for catching this. I agree the change loses the benefit. I have reverted back in -20 version.

 

 

 

> The example in Figure 23 for establishing a YANG-Push subscription over RESTCONF is wrong. Since YANG-Push is used, "ietf-yang-push:datastore"

> 

> needs to be in the input parameters and the correct subtree filter tag is "ietf-yang-push:datastore-subtree-filter" and not "stream-subtree-filter".

> 

> 

> 

> Furthermore, since the example is using YANG-Push over RESTCONF, add a normative reference to RFC 8650.

> 

> [Bo Wu] Thanks for catching this issue. We have corrected with "ietf-yang-push:datastore-subtree-filter".

 

You still need to add the "ietf-yang-push:datastore" node to the establish-subscription RPC input parameters, e.g. something like

 

    "ietf-yang-push:datastore":"ietf-datastores:running"

 

[Bo Wu] Thank you for providing help again. I should NOT miss this mandatory node. Fixed in -20 version.

 

 

 

> The following idnits warnings should be attended:

> 

> draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-17.txt:

> 

> 

> 

>   Miscellaneous warnings:

> 

> 

 

I just thought I would at least mention them, thanks!

 

I don't know about the YANG warning, maybe that should be looked into by YANG Doctors.

[Bo Wu] I will ask some advice from YANG doctors.

 

Thank,

Bo

 

 

 

 

--

Per

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux