> Thank you Randy, but I’m confused: your earlier mail pointed a 50-odd > page draft that updates RFC 7454. This newer document is very thin! I > guess that’s what you get from the back and forth. actually, in the ietf, back and forth is usually drek and froth, producing an even more massive document. rarely do simplicity and/or reason prevail. i say enjoy it while we can. randy -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
