Re: Algorithm requirements

[S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Roman,

Please see 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jO3BxYMD79LxzCs7Sc_ihO0h_uk/ 
I did not find anything unreasonable in the 2022 discussion.  I am 
not keen on DISCUSSes being viewed as "standards process" policy as 
the "standards process" community might end having to subscribe to an 
all-DISCUSS feed to track down what's policy.

There has been discussions in several venues about incorporating 
national standards in IETF Stream specifications for over a year or 
more.  Some of those venues are for IETF activities and some of them 
are for non-IETF activities.  There were times when the discussions 
were quite spirited.

One alternative is to have some steering to see whether the various 
opinions could be turned into a policy or not.  Another alternative 
is to do nothing.  I have not given much though to whether there were 
other alternatives.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy