Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Similarly, for MITM, unless the goal is to avoid the gendered term
> "Man", I really don't think it's worth it to try to change MITM to
> "Active On-path Attacker". For people who are security specialists,
For those who wonder about this comment that seems to be a non-sequitor, please see:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/GSi83LeAbPSkcFcUsqJgmqECI8E/
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
