On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 09:55:15AM -0500, Shumon Huque <shuque@xxxxxxxxx> wrote a message of 211 lines which said: > In my view, this is not an erratum, which would imply there was an > error in RFC4035. That RFC was focussed on the originally envisioned > mode of DNSSEC, using pre-computed signatures, and did not take into > account online signatures Is it written somewhere? I always thought that RFC 4034/4035 allows pre-computed signatures but does not require them. Nothing in it seems to assume static signatures. IMHO, RFC 4034/4035 are quite neutral about static vs. dynamicc signatures. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
