Re: "Historic" is wrong

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: "Historic" is wrong
From: Ross Finlayson <finlayson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 22:57:42 +1300
In-reply-to: <5421ecae-a0bd-4a57-a3a0-9aec415c49b8@lear.ch>
References: <D7AB4655-8869-4357-8B6C-933BECA7A5F7@strayalpha.com> <65ED3845-5518-49EF-BD15-1B2831C97341@strayalpha.com> <16374.1734925793@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <CAMGpriVJTGE+xwJvYMcg45Q-4bf9VQrYs-LUgRa0tJ3UHDAjCA@mail.gmail.com> <B08DC7C3E5D8C7E86BBDD7E6@PSB> <56FAC593-4577-4154-A4F5-62B91703BE51@live555.com> <5421ecae-a0bd-4a57-a3a0-9aec415c49b8@lear.ch>


> On Dec 25, 2024, at 10:23 PM, Eliot Lear <lear@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> We're not net.cops.

Of course not.  But we’re talking about legislation, not enforcement.

	Ross.

References:
- [Last-Call] Re: Last Call: Moving RFCs 793, 1065, 1723 and 1725 to Historic
  - From: Joe Touch
- [Last-Call] Re: Last Call: Moving RFCs 793, 1065, 1723 and 1725 to Historic
  - From: Joe Touch
- "Historic" is wrong
  - From: Michael Richardson
- Re: "Historic" is wrong
  - From: Erik Kline
- Re: "Historic" is wrong
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: "Historic" is wrong
  - From: Ross Finlayson
- Re: "Historic" is wrong
  - From: Eliot Lear

Prev by Date: Re: "Historic" is wrong
Next by Date: [Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-tls12-frozen-05.txt> (TLS 1.2 is in Feature Freeze) to Informational RFC
Previous by thread: Re: "Historic" is wrong
Next by thread: Re: "Historic" is wrong
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux