[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: Moving RFCs 793, 1065, 1723 and 1725 to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19-Dec-24 07:27, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 18 Dec 2024, at 11:46, S Moonesamy wrote:

The supporting document does not have any information about when the
request was made and who sent it.  Would it be possible to disclose
who the individual participant is?

Just in case others are curious: It was me, last week. Does it matter?

It doesn't matter at all, but thanks for the discussion anyway.

I'm curious, why only 4 candidates? I tweaked my code to separate out
the cases that are obsoleted Internet Standards, and there are eight of
them:

### Internet Standards (8 RFCs)

RFC0793 (STD?): Transmission Control Protocol
RFC0821 (STD10): Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
RFC0822 (STD11): STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OF ARPA INTERNET TEXT MESSAGES
RFC1065 (STD?): Structure and identification of management information for TCP/IP-based internets
RFC1119 (STD?): Network Time Protocol (version 2) specification and implementation
RFC1723 (STD?): RIP Version 2 - Carrying Additional Information
RFC1725 (STD?): Post Office Protocol - Version 3
RFC1869 (STD10): SMTP Service Extensions

(The STD? cases are where rfc-index.xml doesn't include the STD number.)

I've put my code at https://github.com/becarpenter/misc/blob/main/RFCstatus.py

   Brian


--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux