[Last-Call] Re: [Ntp] Re: [EXT] Re: Last Call: Status Change of NTPv2 and NTPv3 to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Note that "historic" does not mean "unused on the Internet".

See also RFC 2026 S4.2.4 and the IESG 20140720 statement on the topic.

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 2:43 AM Windl, Ulrich <u.windl@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!

I also tried to find out what NTP version Windows Domain Controllers use. Here it had been suggested to use them as primary servers for all (UNIX/Linux) clients (like "There won't be any more problems if all the world runs Windows"), but I could not even find out whether those support symmetric key authentication. So probably: NTPv3 isn't dead.

Kind regards,
Ulrich Windl

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Murray <halmurray@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 10:44 AM
> To: Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: last-call@xxxxxxxx; NTP WG <ntp@xxxxxxxx>; Hal Murray
> <halmurray@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] [Ntp] Re: Last Call: Status Change of NTPv2 and NTPv3 to
> Historic
>
>
> > It would be interesting to know to what extent NTPv3 is used these days.
>
> >From a pool server, Dec 3-4, 2024
>
> Quick answer, less than 20%
>
> Looks better in a fixed pitch font.  My mail system will probably wrap
> long lines.
>
> 48 byte packets. Total is 600154088:
>   NTPv0  NTPv1  NTPv2  NTPv3  NTPv4  NTPv5  NTPv6  NTPv7      total
>     784  1401K      1      5     17      2      5      6    1402099 unspec
>       7  49658      4 183450   7645      3      5      2     240774
> symm-act
>       4      2      4      1     69      4     16      4        104
> symm-pass
>       2  2625K 220483   100M   494M      3     13      2  598332715 Client
>       5     24      6  63582 111181      5      6      5     174814 Server
>       3     21      3   3324      3      3      6      2       3365 Bcast
>       2      7      5      2      5      6      2      6         35 Mode6
>       6      2      7    148      4      5      5      5        182 Mode7
>     813  4076K 220513   101M   494M     31     58     32 total
>
> 48 byte packets, % of 600154088:
>   NTPv0  NTPv1  NTPv2  NTPv3  NTPv4  NTPv5  NTPv6  NTPv7 total
>   0.000  0.233  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.234 unspec
>   0.000  0.008  0.000  0.031  0.001  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.040 symm-act
>   0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 symm-pass
>   0.000  0.437  0.037 16.795 82.427  0.000  0.000  0.000 99.697 Client
>   0.000  0.000  0.000  0.011  0.019  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.029 Server
>   0.000  0.000  0.000  0.001  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.001 Bcast
>   0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 Mode6
>   0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000  0.000 Mode7
>   0.000  0.679  0.037 16.837 82.447  0.000  0.000  0.000 total
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ntp mailing list -- ntp@xxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ntp-leave@xxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ntp mailing list -- ntp@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ntp-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux