[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsvr-bgp-spf-39

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David, 

Thanks for your review. 

> On Dec 2, 2024, at 5:06 PM, David Mandelberg via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: David Mandelberg
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Overall, looks good. I have one question which might be relevant to security,
> but I'm not sure.
> 
> Sections 5.2.1.1, 5.2.2.2, and 5.2.3.1 say "The BGP-LS-SPF Node NLRI Attribute
> SPF Status TLV, Link NLRI Attribute SPF Status TLV, and Prefix NLRI Attribute
> SPF Status TLV use the same TLV Type (1184). This implies that a BGP Update
> will include a single NLRI." Is it possible to have multiple NLRI of different
> types in the same update? Maybe it's worth adding a MUST NOT about that, and
> adding something to section 7 about how to handle that case?

We're not going to change this. Note that the Status TLVs are optional

Thanks,
Acee



> 
> 

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux