Reviewer: Shivan Sahib Review result: Has Issues The document generally looks straight-forward. However, it's surprising to me that the Security Considerations section completely defers to RFC 4861. For example, surely a device lying about being a SNAC router would have some added implications for DoS capabilities like mentioned in Security Considerations section of RFC 4861 and RFC 3756? I think it would be worth spelling out what happens in that scenario. Nit: In the introduction, "Stub Network Auto-Configuring Router (SNAC) router" says router twice, can just remove the first "Router". -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
