Hello,
what's about a gender neutral name? "Mandy" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandy_(name)) would be close to "Man".
Regards,
Dieter
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2024 12:43
An: Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus=40siemens.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; noloader@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: tsv-art@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; spasm@xxxxxxxx
Betreff: [lamps] Re: Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07
From: Brockhaus, Hendrik <hendrik.brockhaus=40siemens.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 06 November 2024 15:02
I just talked to Tim Hollebeek.
He proposed to change 'man-in-the-middle' to 'meddler-in-the-middle' to stay with the abbreviation MITM.
<tp>
One of our ADs always used to use 'Monkey in the Middle' which seemed suitably asexual,
Tom petch
Hendrik
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lars Eggert <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. November 2024 10:47
An: noloader@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: tsv-art@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis.all@xxxxxxxx;
last-call@xxxxxxxx; spasm@xxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [lamps] Tsvart last call review of
draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis-07
Hi,
On Nov 5, 2024, at 16:45, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Two counterpoints. First, "man-in-the-middle" is a term of the art.
It does not lend itself to word swapping. I don't think it is wise
to invent new terms for a well established term.
the IETF has agreement to use the guidance in NIST.IR.8366. The
proposed rewording is aligned with Section 4.1 of NIST.IR.8366.
Thanks,
Lars
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Spasm mailing list -- spasm@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to spasm-leave@xxxxxxxx
