Hi All, While the tool does have the capability to update a review and retain previous review comments, the methodology varies across different directorates. Each directorate has developed its own unique approach to using the tool, largely due to historical operational practices. If it aligns with the SecDir's operational expectations, it's straightforward for the chairs (or the secretary or even an AD) to request a fresh SecDir review. (As AD I try to not get overly involved in the day-to-day operation of a WG, however if it is ok by the bier-chairs I can initiate the request for a fresh secdir review to speed up the draft handling) G/ Routing Area Director -----Original Message----- From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@xxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2024 1:35 PM To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; bier@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; secdir@xxxxxxxx Subject: [secdir] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bier-oam-requirements-12 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Greg Mirsky writes: > thank you for your comments and the discussion. I appreciate it if you > could update that status of your review in the Datatracker from "Has > nits" to reflect the conclusion of our discussion. We do not normally do that in the secdir. The review status in the datatracker reflects the status of the original review. When the document goes forward there might be another review (at least during the telechat time), and then the reviewer will redo review and there will be new review posted. -- kivinen@xxxxxx -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
