[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hiya,

On 10/11/24 00:45, Jeffrey Haas wrote:

The scenario Stephen points out is a reflection attack, and thus
potentially has a role in obscuring the attacker, but it is NOT an
amplification attack.

Just to note I agree with the above. (Well, assuming bfd packets
can't be crafted to also be a valid UDP broadcast packet or some
such, but that'd be surprising.)

I'm fine that the authors/ADs etc figure out what if any further
change is warranted.

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux