On Sep 19, 2024, at 5:38 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do folks consider that the Vancouver IETF was a second instance of the experiment? Because there ended up being five sessions scheduled at the same time, which is less than the typical seven-eight sessions, but also not the expected zero. I understand the how/why the scheduling ended up that way, but I stlll have doubts about drawing any conflusion other than “can’t do it regularly.”
I have all of the same questions.
Bob
|
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
