Thanks for your feedback, Eliot!
With respect to the
examples nits, the focus of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher is on voucher objects.
More concrete use cases should be described in other specifications, e.g., draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
Best regards
Thomas
Von:
Eliot Lear via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Datum: Montag, 16. September 2024 um 10:50
An: iot-directorate@xxxxxxxx <iot-directorate@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: anima@xxxxxxxx <anima@xxxxxxxx>, draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@xxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12
Reviewer: Eliot Lear
Review result: Ready with Nits
This draft describes a JWS-protected RFC-8366 voucher. It is well written and
clear.
Major issues:
None.
Minor issues:
None.
Nits:
I would prefer a more complete test vector in the examples. That is, could you
provide the inputs that produced them?
|
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
