Hi Gyan, This is a friendly reminder for the rtgdir review on draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-16, could you help on it? Thanks. Best wishes, Haomian & Daniam -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <dceccare@xxxxxxxxx> 发送时间: 2024年9月3日 18:52 收件人: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@xxxxxxxxx>; rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx 抄送: ccamp@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx 主题: RE: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11 Hi Gyan, Thanks a lot for your review. We asked for the joint review of two drafts: - draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11 - draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-16 Would it be possible for you to complete also the review of the second one or do you prefer us to ask Daniam and Haomian to allocate a new reviewer? Thanks a lot for your help so far. Daniele -----Original Message----- From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, September 2, 2024 6:57 AM To: rtg-dir@xxxxxxxx Cc: ccamp@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx Subject: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11 Reviewer: Gyan Mishra Review result: Ready I have reviewed the latest version 11 of the draft. Many thanks to the authors in updating RFC 9193. AFAIK I believe in this case a BIS to RFC 9193 was the correct path taken to fix all the Layer 0 data types that were missing in RFC 9193. Nicely done and very thorough work done by the authors and all contributors. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits: None -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
