[Last-Call] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-capacity-insights-extensions-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peter,

Thank you for your review. Responses to your comments are inline below.

Ben

Capitalization varies throughout the document. Sometimes telemetry is
capitalized. Other times it is not, and I’m not talking about in the names of
objects. I’d suggest lower case would be sensible unless telemetry is a very
specific term when used in the CDNI context. A search of RFCs 8006 and 8008
don’t show this to be the case. The word “object” when used in the context of
an object name is inconsistently capitalized, outside of title case in section
headers. Choose one capitalization for the word and use it consistently.

This should be resolved in revision 07. The term is capitalized when used in the context of an object name, in accordance with the specified identifier, and lower case when used in explanatory language without reference to a specific object.

In at least the text version, the header cuts off the name of the document
after the “E” in “Extensions”. I don’t know if there’s anything you can do
about that, however.

I don't know of a way to resolve this. If someone else knows how to fix this, I will make the required edits.

Page 1, Abstract, 1st paragraph: expand the initialism “CDNI” as this is its
first use. Also do so for “uCDN” and “dCDN”. The reason is that the abstract
will be made available separately from the document body, so there’s no
opportunity to search in the body for the meaning of these acronyms.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 1, Abstract, 2nd paragraph: expand the initialism “FCI” for the same
reason.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 4, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: insert “that” before “may”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 4, 4th paragraph, 2nd sentence: change “long lived” to “long-lived”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 5, 1st paragraph, last sentence: change “dCDN provided” to “dCDN-provided”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 6, section 2.1.1.1, 2nd sentence: change “to allow for to reference a to
another” to “to allow for referencing another” or “to allow for reference to
another”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 7, Table 1, Description: change “datasources” to “data sources”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 7, “time-granularity” description, 2nd sentence: change “e.g.” to “E.g.”.

This is resolved in revision 07. The description was reworded to remove use of "e.g.".

Page 10, “current” description, last sentence: the reference for Telemetry
Source Object would seem to be section 2.1.1, not section 2.2.1.2. And place
the word “section” and whatever section number you decide upon inside
parentheses.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 11, section 2.2.1.2, “metric” description: change “an” to “a” before
“Telemetry Capability”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 13, section 3.1.2, Purpose: delete “a” before “utilization”.

This is resolved in revision 07.

Page 15, Authors’ Addresses: in the text version, the state is separated from
the city for some reason. In all other versions, there’s an excess space after
the city name but before the comma before the state abbreviation. I do not know
if there’s anything you can do to correct this as I do know the cause of the
disparate output forms.

I don't know if there's anything we can do to fix this. The text version is derived from the XML source.

--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux