Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) <rwilton=40cisco.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 3. Split/migrate the existing IETF process into what must be in the
> RFCs/BCP and what moves to webpages (hopefully also incorporating
> appropriate IESG statements). If we want to change core parts of the
> IETF process, i.e., the parts that are documented in BCPs, then this
> may be a time to consider this, but this could also be deferred, to
> reduce risk). Moving text to webpages may be quite a lot of work, but
What kind of risks are you thinking here?
I think that the biggest risk is a 1000 message long debate over minutia
which pisses off half the community, and we lose the energy to finish :-)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
