Thanks, Peter!
We'll buffer those changes.
Cheers,
Adrian
On 10/08/2024 06:26 BST Peter Yee via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Reviewer: Peter YeeReview result: Ready with NitsI am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General AreaReview Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processedby the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments justlike any other last call comments.For more information, please see the FAQ atDocument: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07Reviewer: Peter YeeReview Date: 2024-08-09IETF LC End Date: 2024-08-08IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechatSummary: This is an informational draft on how (IETF) network slicing in TEnetworks can be accomplished using concepts from RFC 8453 and RFC 9543. This iswell outside of my wheelhouse, so I’m not providing any real technical input.There are some editorial items in the document that ought to be fixed beforepublication. [Ready with nits]Major issues: NoneMinor issues: NoneNits/editorial comments:Page 1, Abstract, 4th paragraph: delete the comma between “ACTN” and “and”.Page 6, section 2.2, 1st sentence: delete the comma between “network” and “and”.Page 6, section 2.3, 2nd paragraph: change “sharing or” to “sharing of”.Page 6, section 1st bullet item: delete the comma after “congestion”.Page 11, section 3.4.1, 1st bullet item: change “is” to “are”.Page 20, section 6, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence: change “providers” to“provider’s”.Page 20, section 6, 3rd paragraph, 1st sentence: change “risk data” to “risk ofdata”. Insert “and” before “no transfer of knowledge”.
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx