% % Bill - as I said in a previous posting - it would be quite fine % for you to say 'IETF- you do not have permission to post my expired ID' % and the IETF should then remove your ID from the IETF's public archive % but just because you might want to do that shoudl not (imo) keep the % IETF from posting the 40,000 or so IDs from others, most of whom I % expect would not object % % % Scott perhaps true. but retro-actively changing the term of a contract, esp when no such escape clause was in effect at the time the contract was in force, is fraught w/ potential liabilities. not saying it could not happen, just that not all that sure of the value proposition of this particular line item makes it worthwhile going after the collective at this time. it would be worth some cycles to modify the BP used to indicate, for the general case, that ISOC or its duly authorized agents(blablabla) reserves the right to maintain any ID published with this clause intact in the ISOC archives. as usual, ymmv. --bill Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf