Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7958bis-03 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2024-08-02 IETF LC End Date: 2024-08-08 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is clear and detailed in all its technical aspects. I have two issues that I would suggest to be addressed before approval. If they are already addressed indirectly I would be glad to be pointed to the text. I categorized them as Minor, as they probably do not impact interoperability within the same version of the mechanism. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. Section 1.2 includes a detailed list of changes from RFC 7985 which is fine. What I am missing, however, is a clear description of the motivation that led to the update. Was that to include the content of the Errata? Was it because of operational or security problems in the deployment? Something else. 2. Is there a requirement for backwards interoperability with the format and publication mechanisms described in RFC 7958. If yes, how is this ensured? In any case, what is IANA instructed to do with the old records? Nits/editorial comments: Section 1.2 mentions 'Added an IANA Considerations section' as a change from RFC 7598. Actually there is an IANA Considerations section in RFC 7598. So probably what was meant was probably 'Updated the RFC Considerations Section'. -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
