Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



% 
% How about prior art? Am I wrong to think of expiry dates as only relating to
% currency to Standards process rather than to the broader record?
% 
% Following on from that does the expiry indicate that the copyright reverts
% back from ISOC to the authors? I hadn't expected that to be the case.
% 
% Christian
% 
% > -----Original Message-----
% > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
% > scott bradner
% > Sent: 10 September 2004 14:30
% > To: harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; sob@xxxxxxxxxxx
% > Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
% >
% >
% > the last time we talked about this Jorge said that he saw no problem
% > (legally) to just offer a takedown process to anyone who felt that
% > they did not want their ID to last longer than N days
% >
% > but, to me, its quite silly to pretend that IDs actually disapear
% > from the net just because teh IETF takes it off of our web site
% >

	last time I went through this w/ my legal advisor,
	the general thrust was that the publication of the
	ID involved a "contractual" set of obligations on
	the parties.  When I allowed ISOC/IETF to publish
	my draft, they agreed tocertain terms/conditions.
	One of those terms/conditions was a limited period
	of publication, after which, the rights revert back
	to the author(s). 


--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]