Re: FTP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

In theory, networks can be virtualized. In practice, virtual networks are
much harder to audit.

As hosts in the Internet are identified by their IP addresses, we
can simply rely on it with or without virtualization..

FTP is limited to the UNIX/VMS notion of file paths for labelling files.

Simply wrong.

Don't try to criticize FTP without having proper knowledge on it.

For example, a hostname used in section 7 of rfc959 is multics.

Appendix I of the rfc is about page structure of TOPS-20 (of DEC).
VMS was a latecomer.

FTP was developed in ages when there were various operating systems
where various file structures (not just a byte stream of UNIX, which
is why FTP has STRU command) were supported and is more robust than
newer protocols.

As for file names, it is, in general, impossible for FTP clients to
properly output characters used by FTP servers. So, it is servers'
responsibility to make their files somehow accessible through
NETASCII. As such FTP works with EBCDIC based OSes or Windows.

						Masataka Ohta




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux