Hi Geoff The points raised in your review were addressed in my response: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/tsqJdkybLRkPKHBt6fRFzC__gSs/ Explanation was given in that response as to why these points did not result in any changes. Jay > On 8 Jul 2024, at 22:22, Geoff Huston via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Geoff Huston > Review result: Almost Ready > > In my reciew of the -08 version noted some issues that I felt could benefit > from further clarification in Section 2.3 as to the circumstances when IETF > antitrust provisions apply (points 1 and 2 in the review > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-halpern-gendispatch-antitrust-08-dnsdir-lc-huston-2024-05-20/). > The text of the draft is unaltered from the -08 version and my comments about > further clarity of the intended scope of application still apply. > > I also noted that I felt that the topic to avoic (section 4.1) should be noted > as an illustrative list, and not necessarily an exhaustive list. > > Finally I also noted some uncertainty relating to the expentation to "behave > lawfully": "A participant participating exclusively by mail in an IETF > activity, and never physically leaving their country of domicile must behave > "lawfully" according to the laws of which jurisdiction?" > > None of these review vcomments have been addressed in -09 and accordinly I do > not believe that this document is "ready" > > -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director exec-director@xxxxxxxx -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
