[Last-Call] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01

[Tony Li <tony.li@xxxxxxx>]

Sue,

Glad you’re doing better.  I’ve submitted this change as -02.  Thank you!

See you in Vancouver!

T

On Jul 8, 2024, at 11:52 AM, Susan Hares <shares@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Tony:

 

This change is wonderful.  Thank you for your patience regarding my response.

 

Sue 

 

From: Tony Li <tony1athome@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 11:06 AM
To: Susan Hares <shares@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; lsr <lsr@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01

 

 

 

 

> On Jun 26, 2024, at 4:51 AM, Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 

> Reviewer: Susan Hares

> Review result: Has Nits

> 

> Type of review: OPS-DIR

> Editorial comments: none

> 

> Process comments:  Normally, it is useful to give some advice to the designated

> experts for the specific registry. RFC5029 gives sufficient advice, but the

> document does not point backward tward RFC5029.

> 

> The designated experts listed for the registry will know the right thing to do.

> However, in the future this registry might have different designated experts.

 

 

Hi Sue,

 

Thank you for your comment.  I would like to propose the following change:

 

OLD

 

   General guidance

   for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370].

 

NEW

 

   General guidance

   for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370] and more specific

   guidance can be found in [RFC5029].

 

 

Would this address your concern?

 

Thanks,

Tony

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx