Hi John,
Thanks for you analysis. It was something I felt lacking and has helping me in my wavering between the absorption into ISOC model and the independent corporate model.
I look forward to your analysis of the absorption model.
a.
On 8 sep 2004, at 01.28, John C Klensin wrote:
But, from a risk analysis standpoint, even the abbreviated list above is a pretty long list. If any one of those assumptions (or any of several of those not listed) is not met and things go seriously wrong, the odds of the standards process grinding to a complete halt -- think "no meetings", "no IESG phone calls", and/or "even less functional mailing lists and archives" as examples-- are non-trivial.
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf