Hi Keith,
At 06:34 PM 14-06-2024, Keith Moore wrote:
First of all I want to state that I also find the single cited
message [1] clearly inappropriate and not consistent with the
purpose of the IETF list. If by that message
I agree with the above-mentioned description. I also agree with the
point which Yoav raised a few days ago.
I may have to listen to the parties involved in a dispute before
making a determination in some other context. That is not how it
works in this context; the choice is between ratifying the decision
taken by IESG members or disagreeing with the decision.
Let's assume that there was a comment about the characteristics of a
person in a working group. If I was handling the mailing list, I
would enable the moderation flag for the sender until further
notice. I would inform the sender about the action and what to
expect. There would also have to be a message to the working group
mailing list as per the requirement in the relevant process document.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx