[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action for Timothy Mcsweeney

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Saturday, June 15, 2024 00:19 -0500 Adam Roach
<adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 6/15/2024 12:08 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>> Noting Bron's request and apologizing if any of Adam's question,
>> your response to it, or my response here get too close to the
>> boundary...
> 
> 
> To be clear, I was not intending to probe whether BCP 83 was in
> need of revision or had outgrown its usefulness, or any other
> process-oriented aspects of moderation and disruption limiting.
> That discussion truly belongs elsewhere. The purpose of my query
> was to provide information to the IESG that I think would be useful
> in contextualizing Keith's declination.

Adam, my question was precisely in that spirit and I think Keith's
responses (both to you and to me) provided exactly that context.
And, Brian and Bron, this illustrates the reasons why drawing a sharp
dividing line can be fairly difficult.

best,
   john

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux