Hi Rich, I'd say I personally don't understand your view at all. Are you suggesting that folks who don't read every single email on a topic can't opine on that particular topic? That would pretty much preclude most IETF participation. Even if you're limiting what you said to the IESG, it doesn't make any more sense to me. If the question to the IESG is "do you believe this set of specific emails justifies a PR action?", then you don't need to read all of ietf@ to answer that question. Alternatively, if the question is "is there community consensus regarding this PR action?", then that can be gauged by reading the threads specific to this PR action on last-call@. Similarly no reason to read all of ietf@. Can you help me understand what exactly you're proposing here?
Thanks,
David (no hats)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:20 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--On that basis, please limit your responses to be substantive comments, with an eye to persuading the IESG of your position, and responsive to that PR only.
In case my view needs to be made more clear.
IESG members who do not participate, or at least follow, in the ietf@ mailing list are not qualified to comment on a person’s impact on the IETF community. This is because they have a limited view of the general community’s views. They should abstain.
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
