Re: Options for IETF administrative restructuring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron Falk <falk@xxxxxxx> writes:

    Aaron> On Sep 5, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:

    >> I do not think that recommendation 7 in scenario B is a good
    >> idea.  I believe that plenary time is full enough without
    >> crowding it more.

    Aaron> What about a 'business meeting' that is scheduled in wg
    Aaron> slot or even on Sunday?

If needed, this would be fine.  I'm not convinced that open f2f time
will be needed.  However I think there is a simple test for whether
the time is needed: can we come up with an agenda that fills a slot
and meaningfully involves the community?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]