[Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Almost Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-10
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2024-05-24
IETF LC End Date: 2024-06-05
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Almost Ready


Major Concerns:

Section B.2: The list of changes should talk about the change of the
Reserved field to the Flags field.


Minor Concerns:

Section 7.4: The last sentence says:

   SSM-aware routers SHOULD
   ignore MLDv1 Report and DONE messages that contain multicast
   addresses in the SSM address, SHOULD NOT use such Reports to
   establish IP forwarding state, and MAY log an error if it
   receives such a message.

I think "SSM address" is supposed to be "SSM address range".


Nits:

Section 1: s/defined in [RFC4607]/defined in [RFC4607]./

Section 5.2.1: s/The Reserved field are/s/The Reserved field is/

Section 7.4.1 and Section 7.4.2: The other tables from RFC 3810 were
reformatted.  Why not this one too?

Section 8.2.1: s/SSM range/SSM address range/

Section B.2: s/changes made since RFC 3810./changes made since [RFC3810]./



-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux