Re: [Ietf-dkim] Re: WG Action: Formed Mail Maintenance (mailmaint) / Commitment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/23/2024 11:19 AM, John Scudder wrote:
To add, relative to your final paragraph about “hold responsible", there are many parts of our process that rely in part on the expectation participants will act in good faith, this would hardly be the first.


John,

Other than the formal requirements concerning intellectual property(*), please cite other examples where the IETF requires open, individual and explicit commitment to anything as substantial as doing an implementation.

As with many of the responses on this topic, there seems to be a remarkable reticence to consider pragmatics and downsides.

Imagine taking that approach to protocol development.

d/


(*) https://www.ietf.org/process/ipr/#ietfrights

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux