I still share John's concern. As I wrote before[1] >So I’m notice that a single-author AD-sponsored BCP revision is getting a relatively lot amount of pushback on one particular area from a number of very experienced IETFers (to be clear: other than me). > Perhaps an AD sponsoring a BCP written by another AD is not the best way forward for something that has such a broad impact. This is the entirety of what I wrote in October 2021. [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2cXJ8ktLL2iKB_qb98mbjeu2K5o/ -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
