On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 3:04 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You mean instead of a BCP? Doesn't really change anything, because it's all a matter of IESG discretion anyway.
If you mean an Info RFC paraphasing a paywalled standard, then again considering IEEE 1588, it's >500 pages long. Paraphrasing that in an RFC without any copyright violation would be an unreasonable amount of work.
Personally, I don't think the IETF should cite such documents. Openness should be a value.
But even considering that source of disagreement, what is the document at hand trying to accomplish?
Here is a Standards Track RFC that already cites IEEE 1588:
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
