On Sat, May 11, 2024 at 1:49 PM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whether implementers or operators are willing to pay for access, or risk
going to court, really isn't the IETF's call. As already mentioned, there's
an analogy with other IPR issues. We *prefer* unencumbered technology and
unencumbered citations, but this can never be 100% achievable.
We could draw a finer distinction. There's a sentence in the draft:
"This document is not known to create any new vulnerabilities for the Internet."
How could it, if we can't read the source material? Why is an Informational RFC not ok?
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
