Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Has Nits
This is an OPS-DIR Last Call review.
This review should be considered as one of the Last Call comments
Status: Ready with Nits
General Comment: I commend the authors for writing up the requirements for this
experiment with compressed routing headers. I look forward for reports on this
experiment.
NITs:
1. Abstract:
Why: English Grammar - Clarity of sentence
Current text:/
Another purpose is
to demonstrate that the security considerations, described in this
document, can be addressed with access control lists. /
Suggested alternate text:/
Another purpose is to demonstrate that access control lists can address
security considerations described in this
document. /
#2. Section 1, paragraph 3.
Why: Grammar, Sentence punctuation and clarity
Old text:/
This document describes an experiment whose purposes are:
* To demonstrate that the CRH can be implemented and deployed.
* To demonstrate that the security considerations, described in this
document, can be addressed with access control lists.
* To encourage replication of the experiment./
New text:/
This document describes an experiment whose purposes are:
* To demonstrate that the CRH can be implemented and deployed,
* to demonstrate that access control lists can address the
security considerations described in this document, and
* To encourage replication of the experiment. /
#NIT 3: Section 10, Textual Representation
Description of problem: This section does not inform the reader why the textual
representation description is needed.
Possible text to be added to section 9 or 10:/
PING and TRACEROUTE report 16-bit SIDS for CRH-16, and
32-bit SIDS for CRH-32. It is recommended that the
experimental reports use the text representations
described below./
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
