sorry for not having suceeded in using github the correct way ;-( I have attached the diff file here for convenience ;-/
Regards
Dirk
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:49 PM Dirk Von Hugo via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Dirk Von Hugo
Review result: Ready with Nits
Dear authors, intarea community,
as assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration
my comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>.
Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as READY
WITH NITS. I am no RPL expert but find the draft clearly written and AFAICT
technically complete. Nits detected mainly affect grammar (a RPL => an RPL
etc.), missing explanation of acronyms, to re-order acronym list, other typos
(in my gut feeling as non-native speaker), missing ',' etc. ... I will post the
diff-tool created .htm document in Pascals github (in case I succeed). Thanks
and best regards Dirk
_______________________________________________
Int-dir mailing list
Int-dir@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir
<<< text/html; charset="US-ASCII"; name="draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-18.diff.html": Unrecognized >>>
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
