Reviewer: Dirk Von Hugo Review result: Ready with Nits Dear authors, intarea community, as assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration my comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/>. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as READY WITH NITS. I am no RPL expert but find the draft clearly written and AFAICT technically complete. Nits detected mainly affect grammar (a RPL => an RPL etc.), missing explanation of acronyms, to re-order acronym list, other typos (in my gut feeling as non-native speaker), missing ',' etc. ... I will post the diff-tool created .htm document in Pascals github (in case I succeed). Thanks and best regards Dirk -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
