> Just so we're clear, that was my going-in assumption and I've kept > that throughout the analysis. Any of the structures I've outlined Understood. > can be focused strictly on administrative support (just like > any of the structures could be corrupted to reach beyond that > focus). That's why I suggested that we do this in two steps: > > 1. agree on the general direction to take > 2. task people to write the specific chartering documents and > publish them as a bcp, including a last call > > Since the devil is in the details, this lets us focus in > on making sure the details are correct and the community has > seen those details and agreed to them before they become policy. > First step, though, is some feeling from the community on which > path to pursue. > > Make sense? (BTW, I'm more than happy to answer questions Absolutely. I thought your report was excellent - very clear and concise. (Long though - how'd you manage it it such a short time :) > about these various mechanisms, processes, functions, and > other buzzwords in the report ... I tried to keep things > clear, but the legal world isn't always perfectly clear. :) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf