> So it sounds like I should just cite the component RFCs, possibly in a nested reference to BCP 195. I can do that, and > it’s probably safer from a possible-future-changes perspective. FWIW, the markdown tooling does this: "as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] ..." And then the entries have the RFC and BCP number: [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.