On 4/9/24 14:14, John Scudder wrote:
But document hosting arrangements are subordinate to the main point in any case. I was referring to the perverse incentive to keep the specification development outside the IETF process. IMO, we want to be a place where people want to bring their ideas for development. I laid out reasons why the suggested draconian enforcement of the I-D boilerplate could lead to people avoiding us instead. If that’s not a perverse incentive, I don’t know what is.
The odd thing is that the I-D submission process was originally
intended to be very low overhead, before XML and the lawyers and
even the tools got in the way.
Keith
