Ack Dan, I'll put some words to that effect.
Many thanks!
Pascal
Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 21:16, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Hi Pascal,Thank you for your response. This makes sense to me, with one observation.On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 3:11 PM Pascal Thubert <pascal.thubert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2. The deployment and backwards compatibility sections are quite good, but is there a recommended strategy for updating existing deployments in the field?This specification introduces a new MoP (14.5. New RPL Mode of Operation) . This means that you cannot update a live network. You have to create a new instance with MoP 5 and migrate nodes to that instance by allowing them to join it. MoPs a re tradictional RPL since RFC 6550, meaning that the behavior is already known outside of this specification.
With the other hat that I sometimes wear, the one of an OPS-DIR reviewer, I would say that this needs to be clarified in an Operational Considerations statement.Regards,Dan
--
Pascal
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
