Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: last-call@xxxxxxxx, draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly.all@xxxxxxxx, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, extra@xxxxxxxx, art@xxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
From
: arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date
: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 21:51:25 +0100
References
: <
171035954191.19370.12807276314372318250@ietfa.amsl.com
>
I object. You can't have two response codes in one tagged response, so
server authors need some flexibility wrt what response codes to
include. SHOULD is right.
Arnt -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
From:
Alexey Melnikov
Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
From:
Barry Leiba
References
:
[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
From:
Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Prev by Date:
Re: [Last-Call] [art] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14
Next by Date:
Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
Previous by thread:
[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
Next by thread:
Re: [Last-Call] [Extra] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-uidonly-06
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Annoucements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Mhonarc]
[Fedora Users]
