Re: [Last-Call] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-e2e-mail-guidance-14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 2024-02-22 15:41:35 -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> But I do encourage you to say *something* about web server based email 
> clients, since they are such a big part of the ecosystem.  (What 
> percentage of all emails have gmail on at least one end?) Perhaps 
> discuss the limitations on secure email with such clients.

I wouldn't want to delay the release of the draft on this, and i'd be
concerned about it blowing up into a large critique of the web
permissions model, which is really outside the scope of what we can
possibly review.

But i hear you that at least some reference to this as a concern might
be warranted.  I've noted this over at
https://gitlab.com/dkg/e2e-mail-guidance/-/issues/12 so there is a place
to keep track of the issue.

If you (or anyone reading this) wants to propose some short, well-scoped
text (either on this thread or in the issue), i'd be happy to review.

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux