Hi Tim, Thanks for the review! Comments inline... On 14/02/2024 00:42, Tim Wicinski via Datatracker wrote: > Reviewer: Tim Wicinski > Review result: Has Nits > > I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These > comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of > the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included > in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should > treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > I am in agree with Russ Housley's genart comments and wish to see those > resolved. We are attempting to address Russ's comments in a forthcoming revision, so hopefully that will address your issues as well. > > Section 9.1 and 9.3 of the IANA considerations refer to the "Example Range" > assigned for use in examples in documentation. This document should have > examples included - perhaps as an appendix. I am always one to want good > examples and bad examples. We do include examples in Appendix B and D of both the text representation and the CBOR encodings. Do you feel these are insufficient? Cheers, Rick -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
