Dear Dan,
Thanks a lot for the review, I cut a new version to address your nits:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tenoever-tao-retirement
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-tenoever-tao-retirement-03
Best,
Niels
On 12-02-2024 23:08, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Has Nits
This document retires and obsoletes the Tao of the IETF as an IETF-maintained
document.It includes the rationale for the retirement and the last edition of
the Tao as published via the processdescribed in RFC 6722. I see no operational
or manageability issues with retiring the Tao of the IETF. This document is
READY, but there are some nits. The most obvious one i that Section 2.1 messes
some of the dates and RFC numbers. I suggest the following edit:
OLD:
The Tao was originally published as [RFC1391] in January 1993. In
the following 17 years, four additional versions of the Tao were
published as RFCs: [RFC1539] in October 1998, [RFC1718] in November
1994, [RFC3160] in August 2001, and [RFC4677] in September 2006. In
August 2012, [RFC4677] was published to document the process for
publishing the Tao as a webpage so that it “can be updated more
easily”.
NEW:
The Tao was originally published as [RFC1391] in January 1993. In
the following 17 years, four additional versions of the Tao were
published as RFCs: [RFC1539] in October 1993, [RFC1718] in November
1994, [RFC3160] in August 2001, and [RFC4677] in September 2006. In
August 2012, [RFC6722] was published to document the process for
publishing the Tao as a webpage so that it “can be updated more
easily”.
--
Niels ten Oever, PhD
Co-Principal Investigator - critical infrastructure lab - University of Amsterdam
Assistant Professor - Department of European Studies - University of Amsterdam
W: https://criticalinfralab.net
W: https://nielstenoever.net
PGP: 4254 ECD5 D4CF F6AF 8B91 0D9F EFAD 2E49 CC90 C10C
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
